Parents’ Views on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Their Children’s Education
Introduction
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rational technology, significantly affecting how AI is utilised, overseen, and governed, and is rapidly transforming education. AI-powered tools such as generative large language models, adaptive learning platforms, and intelligent tutoring systems are being used more in schools and at home. This widespread adoption raises new questions about how parents perceive these technologies, what attitudes they hold, and the concerns they may have. Parents serve as both influencers and mentors in education and in policy discussions. Despite this central role, research examining parental perspectives on AI in education is still emerging and often fragmented, drawing from diverse fields such as educational technology, human-computer interaction, sociology, and developmental psychology. This article aims to synthesise current evidence regarding parents’ views on AI in their children’s education. The findings are organised into four primary areas: (a) perceived benefits and motivations, (b) concerns and risks, (c) determinants and variations in parental attitudes, and (d) implications for policy and practice.
Perceived Benefits
and Motivations
Parents’
attitudes toward AI in education are often ambivalent — combining optimism
about opportunities with pragmatic or conditional approval.
1. Support for AI as
an Educational Aid
Several
studies report that parents recognise potential learning benefits associated
with AI tools. A recent discrete choice experiment in Kenya found that parents
value AI-powered early childhood education tools, particularly when they support
core academic content (e.g., mathematics) and offer comprehensive parental
control over usage and content features. Parents showed the greatest willingness to pay for these control features, suggesting that well-designed AI can
be viewed as an educational resource rather than a replacement for adult
guidance.
Similarly,
research on kindergarten parents’ perceptions of AI technologies reveals positive
views toward AI literacy education and the use of AI tools in early learning
contexts, especially when frameworks for responsible integration and parental involvement are in place. These parents expressed appreciation for AI’s capacity to
augment learning experiences and support foundational skills, even as they
noted practical concerns that would need to be addressed for successful
implementation.
2. AI to Foster AI
Literacy
Parents
increasingly view AI literacy as an integral part of future digital competencies.
Surveys (e.g., Samsung Solve for Tomorrow) indicate that large majorities of
parents believe AI knowledge will be crucial for their children’s careers and
lives, even if current school curricula lag in formal AI instruction. This
reflects a broader shift in educational expectations: rather than viewing AI
strictly as a tool for solving homework, see it as part of the essential literacies
of the 21st century.
3. Parental Mediation
and Co-Learning
Qualitative
research highlights that parents often engage with AI alongside their children,
framing AI as a co-learning partner. In focus group studies, parents described
efforts to navigate AI use jointly with children, underlining AI literacy not
only as a student competency but also as a family practice. This shared
engagement allows parents to monitor, contextualise, and scaffold children’s AI
use, thereby transforming potential risks into opportunities for dialogue and
critical thinking.
Concerns and Risks
While
acknowledging benefits, parents express significant concerns that intersect
with cognitive, ethical, and sociotechnical dimensions.
1. Data Privacy and
Security
A
recurring theme across contexts is worry about data privacy and the safety of
children’s information. When AI systems collect, store, or process educational
data, parents express reservations about how that data is used, shared, and
protected, particularly when clear governance frameworks are absent. Both
research experiments and public opinion polls (e.g., policy reports on AI in
K-12 schools) show that a considerable proportion of parents oppose unfettered
sharing of student data with AI systems, citing privacy and equity concerns.
2. Accuracy,
Reliability, and Trust
Parents
often question the reliability and accuracy of AI-generated content. Studies on parents’ attitudes toward AI in healthcare, though in a different domain, reveal that many parents view AI-generated information as at best partially accurate, underscoring the need for caution about over-reliance on algorithmic outputs. While these
findings relate to healthcare, they echo concerns in education, where
misinformation or incorrect guidance from AI tools could mislead children or
undermine learning.
3. Over-reliance and
Skill Erosion
Concerns
about over-dependence on AI are frequently mentioned. Critics argue that
excessive AI use may erode foundational learning skills such as critical
thinking, problem solving, and academic self-efficacy. Research on AI in
education notes that generative AI could reduce learners’ motivation to engage
deeply with content if users resort to quick answers rather than the cognitive
work necessary for mastery. Parents similarly worry that children might use AI
to bypass thinking, committing academic tasks to machines rather than learning
the underlying concepts — a concern mirrored in student experiences reported
elsewhere.
4. Ethical, Social,
and Emotional Risks
Parents
are also attuned to broader ethical and social dimensions: the possibility that
AI might displace human interaction, reduce empathy, or normalise machine
authority in learning spaces. While some see AI as a tool to support
relationships, others worry that excessive AI integration could inadvertently
diminish rich human-to-human engagement that is critical for social and
emotional development.
Determinants and
Variations in Parental Attitudes
Parental
views are not homogeneous; they vary across demographic, socioeconomic, and
contextual factors.
1. Digital Literacy
and Educational Level
AI
literacy among parents significantly influences attitudes. Research from Hong
Kong indicates that parents’ own understanding of AI correlates with confidence
in guiding their children’s learning, reinforcing the view that AI literacy is
not solely a student outcome but a key dimension of parenting self-efficacy.
Parents with higher educational attainment and greater digital fluency tend to
express more nuanced views, balancing enthusiasm with critical awareness.
2. Socioeconomic and
Cultural Contexts
Parental
preferences also reflect cultural and economic realities. In low- and
middle-income settings, affordability and accessibility are critical
determinants of whether AI educational tools are seen as desirable or feasible.
For example, in Kenya, parents valued parental control and quality content but
were extremely sensitive to cost, illustrating how financial considerations are
intertwined with technology acceptance.
Similarly,
variations in attitudes can be observed between rural and urban populations and across different education systems, suggesting that contextual factors and exposure influence how parents perceive AI’s utility and
risks.
3. Generational and
Knowledge Gaps
There
is often a disconnect between children’s AI use and parents’ awareness of that
use. Large surveys reveal gaps between actual usage, particularly among adolescents
and parents’ perceptions, highlighting that many parents may underestimate or
misunderstand how and why their children engage with AI tools. These gaps
present challenges for parental mediation, as well as opportunities for
schooling systems to involve parents in dialogues about AI, its ethical use,
and its pedagogical role.
Theoretical
Perspectives on Parental Mediation
Understanding
parents’ views requires situating them within broader theories of technology
adoption and educational engagement.
1. Technology
Acceptance Models
Classic
technology acceptance theories (e.g., TAM) suggest that perceived usefulness
and perceived ease of use are key determinants of adoption. Applied to
AI in education, parents’ willingness to accept AI tools is mediated by their
beliefs about whether those tools support learning and whether they are
manageable within family routines. Studies reflect this pattern: parents
embrace AI when they perceive benefits that outweigh complexity and risk.
Family
media mediation theories emphasise parental roles in regulating children’s technological
use, balancing restrictive mediation (setting limits) with active mediation (discussing
content and context). In AI contexts, parents who engage actively with children
in using AI tend to develop more positive and informed attitudes. This aligns
with findings that joint exploration fosters better understanding and critical
awareness, reducing anxiety about unmonitored use.
Implications for
Policy and Practice
Parental attitudes toward AI in education carry significant
implications for educators, policymakers, and technology designers:
1. Supporting
Parental AI Literacy
Educational policy should include components that enhance parents’ understanding of AI, not only to demystify technology but also to help families distinguish between supportive and problematic uses. Workshops,
informational resources, and school-community dialogues are promising
strategies.
2. Designing
Human-Centred AI Tools
AI developers should prioritise features that reflect parental preferences, such as transparency, parental controls, data privacy safeguards, and content appropriateness. Parental involvement in co-design
processes can ensure that AI tools align with family values and educational
goals.
3. School-Family
Collaboration
Schools can play an active role in communicating how AI is used in
instruction and assessment. Creating forums for parents to express concerns and
receive evidence-based guidance can bridge the perception gap and foster
shared responsibility for children’s AI literacy. Policy frameworks that
include parents as stakeholders can enhance trust and adoption.
Conclusion
Parents’
views on AI in their children’s education are complex and multifaceted. Across
diverse contexts, parents recognise AI’s potential to enrich learning and
prepare children for a technologically advanced future. Yet, they also voice
substantial concerns about privacy, accuracy, over-reliance, and ethical
implications. These attitudes vary significantly based on digital literacy,
socioeconomic conditions, cultural context, and exposure to AI.
Empirical
research suggests that parents are neither uncritically enthusiastic nor resistant;
instead, most adopt a conditional acceptance, contingent on perceived
benefits, risks, and the degree of control they retain. Understanding this
nuanced landscape is critical for educators, technologists, and policymakers
seeking to integrate AI responsibly into education.
As
AI becomes more embedded in educational ecosystems, robust engagement with
parents through literacy programs, transparent communication, and participatory
design will be vital in shaping AI’s role in children’s learning. Continued
research that foregrounds parents’ voices will help ensure that AI complements
rather than compromises educational values and outcomes.
References
Akgun, S., Greenhow, C., &
McClain, K. (2024). Parents’ perspectives on children’s use of artificial
intelligence: Opportunities, concerns, and mediation strategies. Educational
Technology Research and Development, 72(1), 89–112.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10289-6
Barna Group. (2023). Parents and
artificial intelligence: Awareness, concerns, and expectations. https://www.barna.com/research/parents-ai/
Buchanan, R., Sainter, P., &
Saunders, G. (2013). Factors affecting faculty use of learning technologies:
Implications for models of technology adoption. Journal of Computing in
Higher Education, 25(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-013-9066-6
Common Sense Media. (2023). Parents,
kids, and AI: Understanding the generative AI landscape. https://www.commonsensemedia.org
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel,
C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications
for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Kumar, S., Sharma, R., & Singh, A.
(2025). Parental preferences for AI-powered early childhood education
technologies: Evidence from a discrete choice experiment. AI and Society, 40(2),
455–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44436-025-00025-z
Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J.
(2008). Parental mediation of children’s internet use. Journal of
Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802437396
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M.,
& Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in
education. Pearson.
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S.
K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). AI literacy: Definition, teaching, evaluation,
and ethical issues. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science
and Technology, 58(1), 504–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.487
OECD. (2021). AI in education:
Challenges and opportunities. OECD Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1787/0f1a1c5e-en
Park, S., Kim, H., & Lee, J.
(2024). Parents’ perceptions of artificial intelligence-supported learning
tools in early childhood education. Education and Information Technologies,
29(3), 4121–4142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12673-4
Radesky, J. S., Weeks, H. M., Ball,
R., Schaller, A., Yeo, S., Durnez, J., Tamayo-Rios, M., Epstein, M., Kirkorian,
H., Coyne, S., & Barr, R. (2020). Young children’s use of smartphones and
tablets. Pediatrics, 146(1), e20193518.
https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-3518
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots
replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.
Times of India. (2024, August 22).
Nearly 70% of parents oppose sharing student data with AI tools in schools.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis,
G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology:
Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Zhai, X., Wang, M., & Ghani, U.
(2023). The role of artificial intelligence in education: A systematic review. Computers
& Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100126
Comments
Post a Comment